Abstract
Land-use change in tropical peatlands substantially impacts peat emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) in addition to emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). However, assessments of full peat greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets are scarce and CH4 and N2O contributions remain highly uncertain. The objective of our research was to assess changes in peat GHG flux and budget associated with peat swamp forest disturbance and conversion to oil palm plantation and to evaluate drivers of variation in trace gas fluxes. Over a period of one and a half year, we monitored monthly CH4 and N2O fluxes together with environmental variables in three undrained peat swamp forests and three oil palm plantations on peat in Central Kalimantan. The forests included two primary forests and one 30-year-old secondary forest. We calculated the peat GHG budget in both ecosystems using soil respiration and litterfall rates measured concurrently with CH4 and N2O fluxes, site-specific soil respiration partitioning ratios, and literature-based values of root inputs and dissolved organic carbon export. Peat CH4 fluxes (kg CH4 ha−1 year−1) were insignificant in oil palm (0.3 ± 0.4) while emissions in forest were high (14.0 ± 2.8), and larger in wet than in dry months. N2O emissions (kg N2O ha−1 year−1) were highly variable spatially and temporally and similar across land-uses (5.0 ± 3.9 and 5.2 ± 3.7 in oil palm and forest). Temporal variation of CH4 was controlled by water table level and soil water-filled pore space in forest and oil palm, respectively. Monthly fluctuations of N2O were linked to water table level in forest. The peat GHG budget (Mg CO2 equivalent ha−1 year−1) in oil palm (31.7 ± 8.6) was nearly eight times the budget in forest (4.0 ± 4.8) owing mainly to decreased peat C inputs and increased peat C outputs. The GHG budget was also ten times higher in the secondary forest (10.2 ± 4.5) than in the primary forests (0.9 ± 3.9) on the account of a larger peat C budget and N2O emission rate. In oil palm 96% of emissions were released as CO2 whereas in forest CH4 and N2O together contributed 65% to the budget. Our study highlights the disastrous atmospheric impact associated with forest degradation and conversion to oil palm in tropical peatlands and stresses the need to investigate GHG fluxes in disturbed undrained lands.
Highlights
Peat swamp forests of Southeast Asia have experienced extensive deforestation and conversion over past decades
Our study addressed five questions: 1) How do peat CH4 and N2O emissions differ between and within oil palm plantation and forest? 2) How do they vary on seasonal timescales? 3) How do environmental parameters control emission rates of these gases? 4) How do peat greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets differ between oil palm plantation and forest and between forest types? And 5) how important is the contribution of CH4 and N2O fluxes to peat GHG budgets in these ecosystems?
In wet months CH4 flux in forest (5.4 ± 0.5 mg CH4 m−2 d−1) was 54 times higher than in oil palm (0.1 ± 0.5 mg CH4 m2 d−1, p < 0.0001) whereas no difference between the two ecosystems was observed in dry months (p 0.3)
Summary
Peat swamp forests of Southeast Asia have experienced extensive deforestation and conversion over past decades. Conversion of peat swamp forest, in particular to oil palm, is a large and growing source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere (Koh et al, 2011; Miettinen et al, 2017; Austin et al, 2018). Flux studies on peatlands in paired forest-oil palm plantation replicated sites are very scarce, with only one study to our knowledge (Cooper al., 2020). Full peat GHG budgets that include net CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes and concurrent measurements of controlling factors in these ecosystems are critically lacking and needed to quantify the impact of forest-to-oil palm conversion on peat GHG emissions and to increase understanding of underlying mechanisms
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
