Abstract
<p>Land-use change in tropical peatlands substantially impacts emissions of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) in addition to emissions of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>). However, assessments of peat GHG budgets are scarce and the contributions of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O remain highly uncertain. The objective of our research was to assess changes in peat GHG flux and budget associated with peat swamp forest disturbance and conversion to oil palm plantation and to evaluate drivers of variation in trace gas fluxes. Over a period of one and a half year, we monitored monthly CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes together with environmental variables in three undrained peat swamp forests and three oil palm plantations on peat in Central Kalimantan. The forests included two primary forests and one 30-year-old secondary forest. We calculated the peat GHG budget in both ecosystems using soil respiration and litterfall rates measured concurrently with CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes, site-specific soil respiration partitioning ratios, and literature-based values of root inputs and dissolved organic carbon export. Peat CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes (kg CH<sub>4</sub> ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) were insignificant in oil palm (0.3 ± 0.4) while emissions in forest were high (14.0 ± 2.8), and larger in wet than in dry months. N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (kg N<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) were highly variable spatially and temporally and similar across land-uses (5.0 ± 3.9 and 5.2 ± 3.7 in oil palm and forest). Temporal variation of CH<sub>4</sub> was controlled by water table level and soil water-filled pore space in forest and oil palm, respectively. Monthly fluctuations of N<sub>2</sub>O were linked to water table level in forest. The peat GHG budget (Mg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) in oil palm (31.7 ± 8.6) was nearly eight times the budget in forest (4.0 ± 4.8) owing mainly to decreased peat C inputs and increased peat C outputs. The GHG budget was also ten times higher in the secondary forest (10.2 ± 4.5) than in the primary forests (0.9 ± 3.9) on the account of a larger peat C budget and N<sub>2</sub>O emission rate. In oil palm 96% of emissions were released as CO<sub>2</sub> whereas in forest CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O together contributed 65% to the budget. Our study highlights the disastrous atmospheric impact associated with forest degradation and conversion to oil palm in tropical peatlands and stresses the need to investigate GHG fluxes in disturbed undrained lands.</p>
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.