Abstract

As an important dimension of emotional assessment, valence can refer to affective valence reflecting an emotional response, or semantic valence reflecting knowledge about the nature of a stimulus. A previous study has used repeated exposure to separate these two similar cognitive processes. Here, for the first time, we compared the spatiotemporal dynamics of the affective and semantic modes of valence by combining event-related potentials with repeated exposure. Forty-seven female participants were assigned to the feeling-focused and semantic-focused groups and thereafter repeatedly viewed the pictures selected for the study. Self-report behavioral results showed that post-test scores were significantly lower than pre-test scores in the feeling-focused group, while the differences between the two tests were not significant in the semantic-focused group. At the neural level, N2 amplitudes decreased and early late positive potential amplitudes increased in both groups, suggesting that the participants perceived the repeated pictures more fluently and retrieved the traces of the stimulus spontaneously regardless of the valence they judged. However, the late positive potential amplitudes in anterior areas and the activity of the middle frontal gyrus were attenuated in the feeling-focused group; however, this component in posterior areas and the activity of the precentral gyrus were increased in the semantic-focused group. Therefore, the processes of affective and semantic valence are similar in the early stages of image perception and retrieval, while in the later stage of valence judgment, these processes show different brain activation patterns. The results provide electrophysiological evidence for the differences in psychological processes when judging the two modes of valence.

Highlights

  • Valence, a primary dimension of emotion, is commonly reflected in self-reports or other measurements in emotional research (Lang et al, 1993)

  • Simple-simple effect analyses showed that the feeling-focused group had significantly higher rating scores in the pre-test than in the post-test among the three kinds of pictures

  • The post-test parietal–occipital late positive potential (LPP) amplitude was higher than the pre-test parietal–occipital LPP amplitude (p < 0.001) (Table 3). These results indicated that the central–parietal and parietal–occipital LPP amplitudes were enhanced after repeated watching, whereas the frontal LPP amplitudes were not influenced by repetition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A primary dimension of emotion, is commonly reflected in self-reports or other measurements in emotional research (Lang et al, 1993). When talking about the valence of emotional stimuli, people use labels such as “happy/sad” and “positive/negative” to describe different affective states. “I feel happy when I see a family photo” tends to describe the valence of inner emotional feelings subjectively, while “This is a happy family photo” tends to describe the valence of events or objects objectively. Emotional feelings and semantic knowledge are different patterns of determining valence. Based on these differences, Itkes et al (2017) have posited that there are two modes of valence: affective (the valence of emotional response) and semantic (the knowledge about the positivity or negativity of events or objects).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call