Abstract

We investigated the spatial-temporal patterns of spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.); SBW) defoliation within 57 plots over 5 years during the current SBW outbreak in Québec. Although spatial-temporal variability of SBW defoliation has been studied at several scales, the spatial dependence between individual defoliated trees within a plot has not been quantified, and effects of defoliation level of neighboring trees have not been addressed. We used spatial autocorrelation analyses to determine patterns of defoliation of trees (clustered, dispersed, or random) for plots and for individual trees. From 28% to 47% of plots had significantly clustered defoliation during the 5 years. Plots with clustered defoliation generally had higher mean defoliation per plot and higher deviation of defoliation. At the individual-tree-level, we determined ‘hot spot trees’ (highly defoliated trees surrounded by other highly defoliated trees) and ‘cold spot trees’ (lightly defoliated trees surrounded by other lightly defoliated trees) within each plot using local Getis-Ord Gi* analysis. Results revealed that 11 to 27 plots had hot spot trees and 27% to 64% of them had mean defoliation <25%, while plots with 75% to 100% defoliation had either cold spot trees or non-significant spots, which suggested that whether defoliation was high or low enough to be a hot or cold spot depended on the defoliation level of the entire plot. We fitted individual-tree balsam fir defoliation regression models as a function of plot and surrounding tree characteristics (using search radii of 3–5 m). The best model contained plot average balsam fir defoliation and subject tree basal area, and these two variables explained 80% of the variance, which was 2% to 5% higher than the variability explained by the neighboring tree defoliation, over the 3–5 m search radii tested. We concluded that plot-level defoliation and basal area were adequate for modeling individual tree defoliation, and although clustering of defoliation was evident, larger plots were needed to determine the optimum neighborhood radius for predicting defoliation on an individual. Spatial autocorrelation analysis can serve as an objective way to quantify such ecological patterns.

Highlights

  • With advances in spatial analysis theory and methodologies, biologists and ecologists have become more interested in analyzing ecological processes from a spatial point of view

  • We evaluated two predictions: (1) defoliation of individual trees within a plot may be spatially clustered in some cases, i.e., highly defoliated trees will be surrounded by highly defoliated trees, and vice versa for lightly defoliated, as would result from preferential selection of oviposition sites by female moths; and

  • Average defoliation for the full plot combined with subject tree basal area explained 80% of the variability of subject balsam fir defoliation, which was 2% to 5% higher than the variability explained by the neighboring tree defoliation, over the 3, 4, and 5 m search radii tested

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With advances in spatial analysis theory and methodologies, biologists and ecologists have become more interested in analyzing ecological processes from a spatial point of view. Spatial point pattern analyses can indicate how individuals locate with respect to each other, by testing the complete spatial randomness null hypothesis [1]. Spatial autocorrelation analyses and indices can be applied to detect if the observed value of a variable at one site is dependent on values at neighboring sites [2,3]. Spatial autocorrelation analyses are used for ecological processes. Quantitative indices of spatial autocorrelation identify and characterize distribution patterns of objects of interest on the ground, and help to bridge the gap between mechanisms and the behavior of the investigated phenomenon [7,8]. Spatial autocorrelation analyses are an appropriate method to detect spatial patterns of insects’ behavior or of forest dynamics related to insect infestations (e.g., [7,8])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.