Abstract

SummaryA previously reported spatial frequency dependent change in contrast sensitivity, apparently produced by the psychometric method used, was investigated in two experiments. A relative reduction in the measured contrast sensitivity function at higher spatial frequencies was found when using a simple single staircase procedure, even when all external characteristics of the presentation procedure were the same as a more sophisticated and more reliable psychometric method (adaptive probit estimation). The estimated false‐negative response rate was found to be greater for the single staircase procedure and was greater at a higher spatial frequency, while the false‐positive response rate to interleaved blank presentations did not vary between spatial frequencies and between the two psychometric methods. This supports the suggestion that some subjects, given a knowledge of the psychometric method controlling grating contrast, may adopt different decision criteria at different spatial frequencies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.