Abstract
A previously reported spatial frequency dependent change in contrast sensitivity, apparently produced by the psychometric method used, was investigated in two experiments. A relative reduction in the measured contrast sensitivity function at higher spatial frequencies was found when using a simple single staircase procedure, even when all external characteristics of the presentation procedure were the same as a more sophisticated and more reliable psychometric method (adaptive probit estimation). The estimated false-negative response rate was found to be greater for the single staircase procedure and was greater at a higher spatial frequency, while the false-positive response rate to interleaved blank presentations did not vary between spatial frequencies and between the two psychometric methods. This supports the suggestion that some subjects, given a knowledge of the psychometric method controlling grating contrast, may adopt different decision criteria at different spatial frequencies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.