Abstract
Climate change objectives of mitigation and adaptation are being mainstreamed into many policies and strategies around the world. In Europe, this has included the Rural Development Programme, which aims to tackle multiple social, economic and environmental objectives in rural areas, and the integration of climate change objectives adds another strand of complexity to the decision making process. When formulating policies determining the likely effectiveness of any particular measure can be challenging, especially with respect to the spatial and temporal variability of greenhouse gas emissions. This is a challenge faced by all countries and regions around the world. This study uses Europe as an example to explore this issue. It highlights the variability in emissions from land use operations that may be encountered under different conditions and time horizons and considers this in the context of policy formulation. The Optimal Strategies for Climate change Action in Rural Areas software has been adapted to derive net greenhouse gas emissions for rural development operations for all regions in Europe. Operations have been classified into five categories based on their benefit/burden over different time horizons. The analysis shows that it is important to understand the time period over which benefits or burdens are realised and determine how this fits with policy instruments, such as land management agreements and the permanency of actions. It also shows that in some regions an operation can have benefits, but in other regions it has burdens; thus, location can be critical. Finally, in the context of developing operations to meet multiple social, economic and environmental objectives, it is important to acknowledge that seeking options that only reduce emissions may not always be practical or possible. In some instances, we may have to accept an increase in emissions in order to meet other objectives. It is important that we evaluate the net greenhouse gas emissions of all operations, not just those aimed at climate change mitigation. We can then select those with the least burden in the process of developing optimal solutions to meet multiple objectives.
Highlights
Climate change has steadily risen up the political agenda over the last 40 years and its objectives are embedded in many policies and strategies, for example the Europe 2020 strategy (EC, 2010) is tackling climate change as one of its five headline targets
Its development involved combining the techniques of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with Geographical Information Systems (GIS)
ArcGIS® was used to generate Regional Variation Categories (RVCs) across Europe for spatial parameters that potentially impact upon greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions
Summary
Climate change has steadily risen up the political agenda over the last 40 years and its objectives are embedded in many policies and strategies, for example the Europe 2020 strategy (EC, 2010) is tackling climate change as one of its five headline targets. Mitigation and adaptation are two key climate change objectives. Mitigation involves actions to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), to reduce their concentration in the atmosphere, and adaptation involves actions to increase capacity to adapt to changes in climate. In the last decade there have been efforts around the world to mainstream (integrate) mitigation and adaptation objectives into regional and national policies. Asia and Africa have formed the Government Group Network for Climate Change Mainstreaming (IIED, 2014); in Europe the European Commission has been making efforts to mainstream climate change objectives into European policy (Berkhout et al, 2013); and there have been efforts to integrate climate change into national sustainable development strategies and plans in Latin America and the Caribbean (Raufer, 2013). In Europe this has included major policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) including the second pillar of the CAP; the Rural Development Programme (RDP) via the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (EC, 2013a)
Accepted Version (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have