Abstract

Monitoring species abundance and distribution is a prerequisite when assessing species status and population viability, a difficult task to achieve for large herbivores at ecologically meaningful scales. Co-occurrence patterns can be used to infer mechanisms of community organization (such as biotic interactions), although it has been traditionally applied to binary presence/absence data. Here, we combine density surface and null models of abundance data as a novel approach to analyze the spatial and seasonal dynamics of abundance and distribution of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) and domestic herbivores in northern Patagonia, in order to visually and analytically compare the dispersion and co-occurrence pattern of ungulates. We found a marked seasonal pattern in abundance and spatial distribution of L. guanicoe. The guanaco population reached its maximum annual size and spatial dispersion in spring-summer, decreasing up to 6.5 times in size and occupying few sites of the study area in fall-winter. These results are evidence of the seasonal migration process of guanaco populations, an increasingly rare event for terrestrial mammals worldwide. The maximum number of guanacos estimated for spring (25951) is higher than the total population size (10000) 20 years ago, probably due to both counting methodology and population growth. Livestock were mostly distributed near human settlements, as expected by the sedentary management practiced by local people. Herbivore distribution was non-random; i.e., guanaco and livestock abundances co-varied negatively in all seasons, more than expected by chance. Segregation degree of guanaco and small-livestock (goats and sheep) was comparatively stronger than that of guanaco and large-livestock, suggesting a competition mechanism between ecologically similar herbivores, although various environmental factors could also contribute to habitat segregation. The new and compelling combination of methods used here is highly useful for researchers who conduct counts of animals to simultaneously estimate population sizes, distributions, assess temporal trends and characterize multi-species spatial interactions.

Highlights

  • Large native herbivores are relatively difficult to conserve because of their wide home ranges and tendency to come into conflict with humans, since they share similar dietary preferences with domestic herbivores [1,2]

  • Density surface models The deviation explained by the best-fit density surface models (DSM) for L.guanicoe varied from 18.1% in July 2010 to 50.4% in February of the same

  • Obtaining un-biased, cost-effective estimates of species abundance and distribution was traditionally a difficult task to achieve for large herbivores, and ecologists have continuously searched for more accurate methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large native herbivores are relatively difficult to conserve because of their wide home ranges and tendency to come into conflict with humans, since they share similar dietary preferences with domestic herbivores [1,2]. The greatest challenge in managing and conserving large herbivores is monitoring their populations, which is crucial when assessing both the success of management actions and formulating new strategies The latter is relevant in the case of the guanaco (Lama guanicoe), which has recently been proposed as a ‘‘pest species’’ by the Santa Cruz province legislature (southern Argentina), which is requesting mitigation actions for population control having no reliable estimates of abundance. Unlike the traditionally design-based approach, the major advantage of DSM is that it allows the estimation of abundance in any sub-area of interest and assess spatial distributions of that abundance [3] This has very important implications for conservation and management of a wide range of species. DSM has been successfully applied to know spatial distribution abundance of aquatic molluscs [6,7], marine mammals [8] and seabirds [9], but to our knowledge, no studies have proven this methodology for terrestrial fauna

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call