Abstract

Guanacos (Lama guanicoe) are thought to have declined in Patagonia mainly as a result of hunting and sheep ranching. Currently accepted estimates of total population size are extrapolated from densities obtained through strip transects in local studies. We used road surveys (8,141 km) and distance sampling to estimate guanaco density and population size over major environmental gradients of Santa Cruz, a large region in southern Patagonia. We also calculated the survey effort required to detect population trends in Santa Cruz. We found considerable spatial variation in density (1.1 to 7.4 ind/km2), with a mean value of 4.8 ind/km2, which is more than twice the mean value guessed for central and northern Patagonia. Consequently, guanaco numbers in Santa Cruz were estimated at 1.1 million individuals (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6), which almost doubles current estimates of guanaco population size in South America. High guanaco abundance was found in arid lands, overgrazed and unable to support profitable sheep stocks. Detecting a 50% change in guanaco population size over a 10-year period requires substantial monitoring effort: the annual survey of between 40 and 80 30-km transects, which becomes up to 120 transects if trends are to be detected over 5 years. Regional patterns in guanaco density can only be detected through large-scale surveys. Coupling these surveys with distance sampling techniques produce robust estimates of density and its variation. Figures so obtained improve currently available estimates of guanaco population size across its geographic range, which seem to be extrapolated from strip counts over small areas. In arid lands degraded by sheep overgrazing, sustainable use of guanaco populations would help harmonize guanaco conservation, socio-economic progress of rural areas, and eventually the restoration of shrub-steppes.

Highlights

  • Guanacos (Lama guanicoe) are thought to have declined in Patagonia mainly as a result of hunting and sheep ranching

  • Excluding the Patagonian survey by Amaya et al (2001), deemed unreliable by IUCN (2013), density estimates used to calculate global guanaco numbers come from local studies or surveys over relatively small regions (e.g., Baldi et al 1997, 2001; Puig et al 1997, 2003) that show considerable variation in guanaco density

  • We report spatial variation in estimates of guanaco population size for Santa Cruz obtained with distance sampling techniques on data from an extensive, large-scale road survey

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Guanacos (Lama guanicoe) are thought to have declined in Patagonia mainly as a result of hunting and sheep ranching. Excluding the Patagonian survey by Amaya et al (2001), deemed unreliable by IUCN (2013), density estimates used to calculate global guanaco numbers come from local studies or surveys over relatively small regions (e.g., Baldi et al 1997, 2001; Puig et al 1997, 2003) that show considerable variation in guanaco density. Given this heterogeneity and the expected influential contribution of Santa Cruz populations (Baldi et al 2006), estimates of population size in Patagonia could substantially depart from figures currently accepted after obtaining more reliable estimates of guanaco numbers in Santa Cruz. Large-scale surveys can help quantify spatial variation in guanaco density

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call