Abstract

The aim of this work is to explore the aerosol optical depth (AOD) data provided by different sources, namely satellite observations, air quality modelling and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations, in order to improve characterisation of aerosol spatial distribution and to assess the contribution of the dust events on AOD over Portugal. Thus, the spatial and temporal variations of the AOD data were analysed for May 2011 taking into account the occurrence of mineral dust events. Satellite data obtained by Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infra-Red Imager (SEVIRI) instrument and air quality modelling results from the Comprehensive Air Quality Model (CAMx) over Portugal were explored. In this work, AOD values with a temporal resolution of 15 min were obtained from SEVIRI. Additionally, 3D data with 23 vertical layers for each aerosol constituent, size distribution and chemical composition were obtained from the modelling approach and used to compute the AOD at 550 nm by integrating of aerosol extinction coefficient (Qext) over the total atmospheric column. Despite the outbreaks of mineral dust occurring during this period, the overall contribution of organic carbon (OC), black carbon (BC) and sulphate (SO 4 ) compounds to the monthly average AOD values estimated by the model is very important achieving 95% mainly located in the northern part of the studied region. The model outputs and SEVIRI data were validated with AERONET observations presenting correlation coefficients of 0.71 and 0.68 respectively. Three different modes of aerosol were classified based on Ångström coefficient versus AOD and distinguishing between the dominance of fine and coarse aerosol fractions. The analysis implemented reveal that intercomparison of satellite observations with air quality modelling contribute to better understanding of the discrepancies presented in spatial pattern of AOD. • AOD data from satellite observations and air quality modelling were used. • Spatial and temporal variations of the AOD data were investigated. • Better correlation between modelling results and AERONET observations was obtained. • Satellite data and modelling results are in agreement but with different absolute values. • Analysis for observation points and for all domain provided different conclusions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call