Abstract
Most models of visual object recognition assume that items belonging to known categories are represented in long-term memory in terms of both structural descriptions and semantic representations. The former specify the visual appearance of category members and the latter allow recognising them as meaningful objects. Nevertheless, the format of these two kinds of representations and their relationships are still a matter of debate. Recently, the independence of structural and semantic representations has been questioned on the basis of the finding of an impaired performance of subjects suffering from semantic dementia on the object decision task, which was originally devised to tap the structural description system. In the present case study of a patient with semantic dementia, we provide data supporting the independence of these two systems. Our results allowed us to better qualify the content and format of structural descriptions in terms of purely geometric non-verbalizable information, specifying the appearance of exemplars at a rather coarse level of categorisation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
