Abstract

This paper provides an overview of two discourses in the study of Japanese popular film, while also bringing the two into conversation with one another in relation to their constructions of “Japan” and “Asia” as conceptual spaces. The discourse known as “victims’ history” is discussed first, drawing on a few relevant films as examples of how the war period is articulated in terms of Japanese suffering. The contemporary political implications of this apparatus within Japanese film are explored. For example, films such as Grave of the Fireflies (1988, Hotaru no Haka) have been internationally lauded for their pacifist stance, despite the fact that this pacifism is, I argue, constituted by the same victims’ narrative that sustains feelings of distrust towards Japan’s East Asian neighbours. In other words, we must consider these films not only in terms of passive victimisation, but also in terms of active erasure. The second discourse considered is that of “New Asianism”, or the modern boom in representations of Asia in popular films. Various commentators have forcibly challenged the idea that the internationalization of Japanese cinema (from the late 1980s to the present), both in terms of industry and narrative representation, has had a decolonizing effect on the Japanese cultural sphere. On the contrary, these films are accused of the exoticisation and Othering of Asia, and I argue they are therefore similar to victims’ history films in their positioning of Asia “outside” of the space of subjectivity.

Highlights

  • Asia Erased or Asia Othered One way of conceptualising popular cinema is as a systematic process of reproducing enclosed spaces of sympathy

  • Conceptual spaces, with the latter expanding and contracting to variously include North East Asian and South East Asian countries, but always outlined to exclude Japan. Following this line of thought, there are two discourses in the study of Japanese cinema which I aim to bring together: that which takes as its object “victims’ history”, recognising a significant body of films in which the Second Sino-Japanese War is articulated primarily in terms of Japanese suffering (Orr, 2001); and that which takes as its object “New Asianism” in film, recognising that non-Japanese East Asians have in recent years gained a higher level of representation in Japanese films, and aiming to understand the manner and the effects of their representation (Ko, 2010)

  • What these two discourses clearly have in common is their critique of Japanese cinema’s conceptual positioning of “Asia” in relation to “Japan”. Both touch on the political implications of a body of Japanese films, and identify how certain political ideologies are reflected, reinforced, or resisted in these films

Read more

Summary

Previously published issues

ISSUE 1 – Between Texts and Images: Mutual Images of Japan and Europe ISSUE 2 – Japanese Pop Cultures in Europe Today: Economic Challenges, Mediated Notions, Future Opportunities ISSUE 3 – Visuality and Fictionality of Japan and Europe in a Cross-Cultural Framework. A privileged area of investigation concerns the mutual cultural influences between Japan and other national or regional contexts, with a special emphasis on visual domains, media studies, the cultural and creative industries, and popular imagination at large. Mutual Images is registered under the ISSN 2496-1868. Mutual Images uses English as a lingua franca and strives for multi-, inter- and/or trans-disciplinary perspectives.

DISCLAIMER ABOUT THE USE OF IMAGES IN OUR JOURNAL
Introduction
SEÁN HUDSON ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call