Abstract
Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union have created very different criminologies in the post-war period. The criminologies of these two countries differ in terms of quality, diversity of subject matter and the level of analytical sophistication. Yugoslavia, with many fewer criminologists in proportion to its population than the Soviet Union, has achieved international recognition for its crime research, a distinction that eludes Soviet scholars despite the significant commitment of financial and human resources by the Soviet state to the study of crime. Soviet and Yugoslavian criminology differ significantly in regard to their organizational structure, internal distribution of their research centers, the training and affiliation of their criminologists and the purpose and nature of their criminological research. These differences, discussed in this paper, are attributable to the historical heritages of the criminologies, the extent of freedom allowed researchers, the degree of ideological commitment and the part...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.