Abstract
The South African government’s Strategic Arms Package (SAP), has beenthe largest public controversy of the post-Apartheid era. We synthesise the debatesabout two dimensions of the SAP, military necessity and affordability, in order toget a better understanding of civil-military relations in democratic South Africa. Oursynthesis shows that the economic enthusiasm about the SAP is both naïve and anopportunity for government and dominant business and industry to wed theirinterests in a way that is not that different from the Apartheid era. In military terms,the SAP has equipped the South African Air Force (SAAF) and South African Navy(SAN) for the most improbable of primary missions. The equipment is also not veryrelevant to secondary missions. The way that the SAP decisions were reachedsuggests that civil-military relations are marked by the continuing impact of pastcompromises, corruption and the centralisation of power in the executive branch.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Scientia Militaria - South African Journal of Military Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
