Abstract
AbstractExperiments were made to identify the sources of error in the Rao procedure for available lysine in cottonseed and peanut meals and to estimate the magnitude of each. The partition of squares in analyses of variance of the data reported revealed that the major error can be attributed to sampling. The variances due to other possible sources of error, such as dinitrophenylation, hydrolysis, chromatography, etc., were not significantly different from the error variance, which (after the sampling error is accounted for) corresponds to confidence limits at the 5% level of probability of ±0.5% of the mean of the available lysine concentration.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
