Abstract
ABSTRACTA case study on the source separation of municipal solid waste (MSW) was performed in Changsha, the capital city of Hunan Province, China. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of different separation methods and compare their effects with citizens’ attitudes and inclination. An effect evaluation method based on accuracy rate and miscellany rate was proposed to study the performance of different separation methods. A large-scale questionnaire survey was conducted to determine citizens’ attitudes and inclination toward source separation. Survey result shows that the vast majority of respondents hold consciously positive attitudes toward participation in source separation. Moreover, the respondents ignore the operability of separation methods and would rather choose the complex separation method involving four or more subclassed categories. For the effects of separation methods, the site experiment result demonstrates that the relatively simple separation method involving two categories (food waste and other waste) achieves the best effect with the highest accuracy rate (83.1%) and the lowest miscellany rate (16.9%) among the proposed experimental alternatives. The outcome reflects the inconsistency between people’s environmental awareness and behavior. Such inconsistency and conflict may be attributed to the lack of environmental knowledge. Environmental education is assumed to be a fundamental solution to improve the effect of source separation of MSW in Changsha. Important management tips on source separation, including the reformation of the current pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) system, are presented in this work.Implications: A case study on the source separation of municipal solid waste was performed in Changsha. An effect evaluation method based on accuracy rate and miscellany rate was proposed to study the performance of different separation methods. The site experiment result demonstrates that the two-category (food waste and other waste) method achieves the best effect. The inconsistency between people’s inclination and the effect of source separation exists. The proposed method can be expanded to other cities to determine the most effective separation method during planning stages or to evaluate the performance of running source separation systems.
Highlights
With rapid social and economic development in China, many cities are faced with the problem of the increasing amount of municipal solid waste (MSW), which reached 179 million tons in 2014
The food waste mainly refers to kitchen waste, whereas in commercial areas, it mainly refers to restaurant waste
This research successfully analyzed the performance of different separation methods through a site experiment with a proposed effect evaluation method, and obtained basic information about Changsha citizens’ inclinations and attitudes toward the source separation of MSW
Summary
With rapid social and economic development in China, many cities are faced with the problem of the increasing amount of municipal solid waste (MSW), which reached 179 million tons in 2014 (statistics from National Bureau of Statistics [NBS] of China). With continuous improvement of the sanitation system and MSW management in China, the MSW disposal capacity has reached 533,455 t/day, with a decontamination rate of 91.8%, which indicates a significant improvement from 61.4% in 2000 (statistics from NBS of China). Despite this progress, the improper and poor MSW management system, which includes conventional mixed collection and transportation systems, may still cause environmental problems originating from the uncontrolled release of methane and leachate (Agdag, 2009) or lead to public health problems (Rajamanikam et al, 2014). The source separation of waste is a practice of the 3R principles (reduce, reuse, and recycle) because it enhances waste recycling and reduces disposal amount (Chung and Poon, 2001)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
