Abstract

Despite their acoustic similarities, human infants are able to discriminate between infant-directed song (as produced by human adults) and infant-directed speech in both English and Russian. However, experimenters are somewhat limited in what they can test using the preference paradigm with infants. As a complement to a previous infant study (Tsang et al. 2016), we asked whether a songbird, the zebra finch, could discriminate infant directed song and speech in English and Russian, and tested responses to stimuli that humans could not categorize as either type. Male and female zebra finches learned to discriminate the stimuli in both languages equally well, although females were slightly faster at learning the discrimination, and generalized responses to untrained stimuli of the same categories. Bird responses to stimuli that humans could not categorize likewise did not follow a clear pattern. Our results show that infant-directed song and speech are discriminable as categories by non-humans, that song and speech are as easy to discriminate in English and Russian, and that comparative studies together can provide more complete answers to research questions about auditory perception and acoustic features used for discrimination than using one species or one language alone.

Highlights

  • Title Songbirds as objective listeners: Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) can discriminate infant-directed song and speech in two languages

  • Twelve adult zebra finches obtained from local pet stores (5 males and 7 females) were used in this study

  • To further analyze the discrimination ratios over acquisition, we looked at males and females separately using a repeated measures language ×bin ANOVA for each

Read more

Summary

Method

Twelve adult zebra finches obtained from local pet stores (5 males and 7 females) were used in this study. See Sturdy and Weisman (2006) for a complete description of the apparatus The stimuli for this experiment were digital audio files consisting of either a speech or a song fragment in either English or Russian (see Supplementary Material for examples). We chose six each of song and speech, using five of each for training and one for generalization testing (as we did for the Russian stimuli). We presented eight “ ambiguous” Russian stimuli not rated as definitely song or definitely speech by English speakers on the Likert scale: two stimuli rated at approximately 2.5, two at 3.5, two at 4.5, and two at 5.5. For these stimuli, mothers may have intended to produce infant-directed song, but the pitch contour matched more closely infant-directed speaking (and vice versa)

Procedure
Results
Discussion
Limitations and Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call