Abstract

The Strickland quarry pegmatite has been extensively studied by Jenks (1935), Cameron et al. (1954), and Chadwick (1958) from geological evidences; and by numerous geochronologists (see summary in Rodgers, 1952; Brookins, 1963). The Contributions of W. H. Pinson, H. W. Fairbairn, and P. M. Hurley (summarized in Variations in isotopic abundances of Strontium, Calcium, and Argon and related topics: NYO-3942. Ninth Ann. Prog. Rpt. for 1961, U.S.A.E.C., Contract AT(30-1)-1381) are of particular significance as their work indicated that the initial Sr(87/86) ratio for the pegmatite mineral isochron would be high (i.e. greater than 0.730) and thus tentatively confirm derivation from material of a previous sialic history. Brookins and Hurley (1965) found that the parent material for the pegmatite was not related to the other basement rocks in the immediate area because: (1) local systems in the Collins Hill formation were too restrictive to allow sufficient migration of material to the present pegmatite site, and (2) the initial Sr(87/86) ratios for the nearby Glastonbury gneiss (0.709) and the Maromas granite gneiss (0.712) were too drastically removed from the pegmatite intercept of 0.735 (based on Sample A4774, a primary plagioclase from the Strickland quarry pegmatite) to allow derivation, from these units. These conclusions are supported by field and petrographic evidence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.