Abstract
In this article, the author contrasts terminology used in the OECD Common Reporting Standard and the Hong Kong rules to adopt it, which are set out in amendments to the Inland Revenue Ordinance in 2016 and 2017. The article discusses the inconsistencies in logic in the Hong Kong terminology. The author also compares the legislative practices of other offshore finance centres on the use of the same terminology, and advocates legislative amendment to rectify the discrepancies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
