Abstract

This paper examines the stiffness degradation and interface failure load on soft soil–concrete interface. The friction behavior and its variability is investigated. The direct shear tests under constant normal load were used to establish parameters to hyperbolic interface model which provided a good approximation of the data from instrumented piles. Four instrumented piles were used to obtain reference soil–concrete interface behavior. It was found that the variability of the friction characteristics is the highest for organic clays and the lowest for organic silts. The intact samples exhibit lower shear strength than reconstituted ones. The adhesion varies significantly depending on interface and soil type, which can result in high scatter of the skin friction prediction. The analysis of parameters variability can be used to determine the upper and lower bound of friction behavior on the interface at constant normal load condition. The backward shearing results in decrease in shear strength up to 40% of the precedent forward phase but higher initial stiffness by a factor of between 2 and 3. Presented research provides basic shear and stiffness parameters for four soft soils (organic clay, organic silt, peat, and silty loam) and gives information about variability of interface characteristics.

Highlights

  • Note: δ = interface friction angle; ca = adhesion; φ’ = effective angel of internal friction; c’ = effective cohesion; τf /τb = forward to backward shear strength ratio; Ki = interface shear stiffness at σn and u; σn = normal stress (CNL); u = horizontal displacement; (1) = 10% sand in peat sample; (2) = estimated point value from one measurement; (3) = secant stiffness; (4) = range depends on external or internal measurement

  • The testing program is focused on several aspects: (1) the repeatability of interface shear strength, (2) the interface stiffness degradation, (3) the fatigue of interface shear strength during backward shearing following forward shearing, (4) the interface shear strength parameters and failure loads for various type of soils

  • The differences in organic clay and silty loam are usually seen between intact samples and reconstituted samples

Read more

Summary

General Considerations

The interface shear strength is important factor in geotechnical design of embankments, retaining walls or pile foundations. The engineering guidelines for determination of soil–structure interface friction properties can be found in many guidebooks [1,2]. There is a very low amount of data considering interface stiffness degradation with displacement. The interface friction fatigue due to large displacement or backward shearing following forward shearing is rarely considered. The application of laboratory test results in prediction of pile shaft friction mobilization is presented. The proper estimations of pile shaft resistance and interface stiffness degradation are crucial for successful design. The usefulness of laboratory interface testing is presented in the comparison with pile shaft friction mobilization obtained from instrumented pile tests. The parameters determined in lab tests are used in simple hyperbolic model [9] to predict the pile shaft unit resistance mobilization

Current State of Knowledge
Aims of the Reserch
Soils Description
NCsilt
Interfaces
Smooth
Smooth Interface
Direct Shear Box Devices
Testing Program
Interface Shear Tests Interpretation
Interface Shear Strength
Friction
Interface Stifness
Hyperbolic Model
Instrumented Pile Tests
Comparison Between Hyperbolic Model and Instrumented Pile Tests
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call