Abstract

Tool-use changes both peripersonal space and body representations, with several effects being nowadays termed tool embodiment. Since somatosensation was typically accompanied by vision in most previous tool use studies, whether somatosensation alone is sufficient for tool embodiment remains unknown. Here we address this question via a task assessing arm length representation at an implicit level. Namely, we compared movement’s kinematics in blindfolded healthy participants when grasping an object before and after tool-use. Results showed longer latencies and smaller peaks in the arm transport component after tool-use, consistent with an increased length of arm representation. No changes were found in the hand grip component and correlations revealed similar kinematic signatures in naturally long-armed participants. Kinematics changes did not interact with target object position, further corroborating the finding that somatosensory-guided tool use may increase the represented size of the participants’ arm. Control experiments ruled out alternative interpretations based upon altered hand position sense. In addition, our findings indicate that tool-use effects are specific for the implicit level of arm representation, as no effect was observed on the explicit estimate of the forearm length. These findings demonstrate for the first time that somatosensation is sufficient for incorporating a tool that has never been seen, nor used before.

Highlights

  • Over the last decades, several studies have contributed characterizing the phenomenon of tool embodiment following use

  • Different senses contribute to tool embodiment: typically, multisensory integration is necessary for tool use effects to emerge when perception in the peripersonal space is assessed[7,12,13,14,15,16]

  • Can we incorporate a tool based on somatosensation alone? To answer this question, here we assessed whether healthy participants - relying solely on somatosensory inputs - could display the pattern of kinematic changes proposed to be the hallmark of tool incorporation in the unconscious body representation for action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies have contributed characterizing the phenomenon of tool embodiment following use. We asked participants to grasp and point to an object with their right hand before and after using a 40 cm-long mechanical grabber with the same right hand The kinematics of both free-hand grasping and pointing movements performed after tool use was modified in a specific and selective way: only the arm-related component of the movement (called transport component) was modified, displaying longer latencies and smaller peaks in several movement parameters (e.g., velocity, deceleration), whereas no change was observed on the hand-related one (called grip component). Convergent evidence from a touch localization task showed that wrist-elbow delivered touches (but not wrist-fingertips) were localized farther apart after use of the same arm-elongating grabber[5] (see [17]) These findings support the old tenet that humans incorporate tools in the action related body representation[9,20]. Healthy participants are able to accurately estimate the length and barycenter of unseen rods if allowed to wield them[29,30,31], suggesting that the brain can form a correct representation of a held object based on somatosensory inputs alone

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call