Abstract

Representations of the body and peripersonal space can be distorted for people with some chronic pain conditions. Experimental pain induction can give rise to similar, but transient distortions in healthy individuals. However, spatial and bodily representations are dynamic, and constantly update as we interact with objects in our environment. It is unclear whether induced pain disrupts the mechanisms involved in updating these representations. In the present study, we sought to investigate the effect of induced pain on the updating of peripersonal space and body representations during and following tool-use. We compared performance under three conditions (pain, active placebo, neutral) on a visuotactile crossmodal congruency task and a tactile distance judgement task to measure updating of peripersonal space and body representations, respectively. Consistent with previous findings, the difference in crossmodal interference from visual distractors in the same compared to opposite visual field to the tactile target was less when tools were crossed than uncrossed. This suggests an extension of peripersonal space to incorporate the tips of the tools. Also consistent with previous findings, estimates of the felt tactile distance judgements decreased after active tool-use. In contrast to our predictions, however, we found no evidence that pain interfered with performance on either task when compared to the control conditions. Our findings suggest that the updating of peripersonal space and body representations is not disrupted by induced pain. That is, experiencing acute pain does not give rise to distorted representations of the body and peripersonal space that can be present in people with chronic pain conditions.

Highlights

  • The multisensory representations of our body and its surrounding space are constantly updated as we interact with objects in our environment

  • Our study aimed to investigate the effect of induced pain on updating of peripersonal space and body representations during and following tool-use

  • We hypothesised that participants would be less able to update peripersonal space and body representations during pain induction to the arm, compared to the two control conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The multisensory representations of our body and its surrounding space are constantly updated as we interact with objects in our environment. Updating peripersonal space and body representations during pain induction the hand, whose receptive fields were malleable as a function of active tool-use [1]. When monkeys actively used a rake to retrieve food, the receptive fields of these neurons expanded to include the area near to and occupied by the rake. Subsequent research in humans has shown that responses to visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli that originate near and on tools are modulated by active tool-use. Changes that arise from active tool-use are thought to reflect that the cortical representations of the body and its surrounding space have been updated to accommodate the new properties offered by the tool (for reviews see [2,3,4,5])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call