Abstract
A review of direct dynamics methods is given, focusing on their application to non-adiabatic photochemistry–i.e. systems in which a conical intersection plays an important role. Direct dynamics simulations use electronic structure calculations to obtain the potential energy surface only as it is required ‘on-the-fly’. This is in contrast to traditional methods that require the surface to be globally known as an analytic function before a simulation can be performed. The properties and abilities, with descriptions of calculations made, of the three main methods are compared: trajectory surface hopping (TSH), ab initio multiple spawning (AIMS), and variational multi-configuration Gaussian wavepackets (vMCG). TSH is the closest to classical dynamics, is the simplest to implement, but is hard to converge, and even then not always accurate. AIMS solves the time-dependent Schrödinger more rigorously, but as its basis functions follow classical trajectories again suffers from poor convergence. vMCG is harder to implement, but its basis functions do not follow classical trajectories and it converges much faster.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.