Abstract
For 1D acoustic wave propagation in the frequency domain, the complex nonlinear Riccati differential equation describes the dependence of the plane-wave reflection response in depth, defined as the upgoing part of the wavefield divided by the downgoing part of the wavefield at that depth. In the case that the model is a velocity gradient interface expressed in terms of a smooth Heaviside function defined by the Fermi-Dirac function, the Riccati equation is shown to have an analytical solution for the reflection response. The solution accounts for all wave phenomena in the gradient zone. The solution of the Riccati equation for the reflection response is obtained by introducing the Riccati equation for the reciprocal of the reflection response which can be related to a second-order self-adjoint linear differential equation. The two latter equations obey the same radiation condition. Furthermore, a connection between the second-order linear equation and the Heun equation is obtained, both being characterized by having four regular singular points. By a change of variables, the Heun equation can be transformed into Gauss’ hypergeometric equation, whereby the solution is expressed as the sum of two linearly independent functions containing hypergeometric functions. The advantage of applying the Heun-to-hypergeometric reduction to the nonlinear Riccati equation is that solutions to the hypergeometric equation are well known. The two functions allow us to analytically determine the Riccati solution because the ratio of the linearly independent functions at infinity is constant. In contrast to the classic frequency-independent reflection coefficient from two layers in welded contact, the reflection coefficient at the surface associated with the gradient interface depends on frequency. In the limit of zero frequency, the reflection coefficient approaches the classic one. We have implemented the iterative solution of the integral form of the Riccati equation and found that the solution builds up nonlinearly to the correct solution. The model is verified by a numerical example valid for 1D wave propagation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.