Abstract
AbstractHere we describe the selective inversion methodology for quantifying the rates of site‐specific ion exchange in materials such as lithium ion battery cathode frameworks. This strategy is shown to be robust in the presence of paramagnetic centers and viable and efficient for the evaluation of hopping rates, in spite of varying initial conditions for the NMR experiment. This is contrasted with 2D EXSY methodology, and selective inversion is shown to be preferable for a number of reasons articulated herein. Work in this area in our group was guided by insights into chemical exchange processes provide by our friend and colleague, Prof. Alex D. Bain. We dedicate this short review to him.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
