Solar Wind Current Sheets: MVA Inaccuracy and Recommended Single‐Spacecraft Methodology

Abstract

AbstractWe present the analysis of 1,831 current sheets (CS) observed aboard four Cluster spacecraft in a pristine solar wind. Four‐spacecraft estimates of the CS normal and propagation velocity are compared with different single‐spacecraft estimates. The Minimum Variance Analysis (MVA) of the magnetic field is shown to be highly inaccurate in estimating the normal. The MVA normal often differs by more than 60° from the normal obtained by multi‐spacecraft timing method, likely due to ambient turbulent fluctuations. In contrast, the cross‐product of magnetic fields at the CS boundaries delivers the normal with an uncertainty of less than 15° at the confidence level of 90%. The CSs are essentially frozen into plasma flow, since their propagation velocity is consistent with local ion flow velocity within 20% at the confidence level of 90%. The single‐spacecraft methodology based on the cross‐product method and frozen‐in assumption delivers the CS thickness and current density amplitude within 20% of their actual values at the confidence level of 90%. The CSs are kinetic‐scale structures with half‐thickness λ from a few tenths to tens of local proton inertial length λp and scale‐dependent shear angle and current density amplitude, and . The classification of the CSs in terms of tangential and rotational discontinuities remains a challenge, because even the four‐spacecraft normal has too large uncertainties to reveal the actual normal magnetic field component. The presented results will be valuable for the analysis of solar wind CSs, when only single‐spacecraft measurements are available.