Abstract

Question: We compared the soil organic carbon stock of the forests of an entire country. The objective of our research was establishing the differences between coniferous or deciduous forests with respect to soil carbon stocks. The question is relevant because coniferous forests are increasingly damaged by abiotic and biotic disturbances that are related to climate change. Deciduous forests are considered to be less vulnerable. Their soils are expected to be more persistent and reliable sinks for carbon dioxide.Methods: Soil data are available from the Austrian Forest Soil Survey. Soils have been sampled on sites of the Austrian Forest Inventory. The data were stratified according to geology (calcareous vs. silicatic bedrock), orientation of the slopes, and forest type (coniferous vs. mixed-deciduous forest). These data were used to establish ground truth of soil organic carbon stocks. Further, we had simulation results of a coupled forest growth/soil carbon model. The scenarios built on the results of the Forest Inventory 2007/09 and reflect a business-as-usual forest management vs. a climate-change adaptation scenario where forest managers replace coniferous with deciduous forests if site conditions permit it. The simulations were performed with the forest growth simulator CÂLDIS and the soil carbon model Yasso07.Results: Based on the Austrian Forest Soil Survey carbon stocks of coniferous forests were consistently higher than in mixed-deciduous forests. This result applies both for the organic litter layer and the mineral soil to a depth of 50 cm. The depth gradients of carbon were similar in both forest types. The simulation under a strong warming scenario showed an increase in the carbon stocks of soils when conifers are replaced by deciduous tree species. In the 150-year simulation the majority of forest sites will become suitable for deciduous forests. The build-up of a large soil organic carbon stock is driven by the stronger harvesting pressure on the remaining coniferous forests. Deciduous forests were in lesser demand and developed under a light forest intervention regime. However, toward the end of the century, when the temperature level is far above present levels, the soil organic carbon stocks declined.

Highlights

  • Organic carbon storage in forest soils is a potential contributor to climate change mitigation

  • Climate change is leading to shifts in the habitat of forest types and deciduous tree species are expected to move into higher elevation where forests are presently dominated by Norway spruce (Hanewinkel et al, 2012; Bircher et al, 2015; Lexer et al, 2015)

  • In our analysis we investigate the evidence for differences in soil organic carbon stocks under coniferous vs. mixed-deciduous forests of Austria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organic carbon storage in forest soils is a potential contributor to climate change mitigation. Changing preferences for tree species as part of the adaptation of forest management to climate change can affect the size of the soil organic carbon stocks. The so-called “secondary Norway spruce stands” presently proof to be vulnerable to biotic and abiotic disturbances and options of eventually replacing them with less vulnerable deciduous forests are investigated (Seidl et al, 2017; Hlásny et al, 2019; Jandl, 2020; Lindner et al, 2020; Mayer et al, 2020). Climate change is leading to shifts in the habitat of forest types and deciduous tree species are expected to move into higher elevation where forests are presently dominated by Norway spruce (Hanewinkel et al, 2012; Bircher et al, 2015; Lexer et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.