Abstract

The persistence of soil organic carbon (SOC) has traditionally been explained as a combination of recalcitrance properties and stabilization processes, which lead to the formation of complex organic compounds. However, recent conceptual advances and experimental evidence challenge this view. Here, we test these conceptual advances using a dynamic equilibrium theory of SOC founded on classic ecological theory. We postulate that the persistence of SOC is an equilibrium point where SOC losses resulting from continuous decomposition and SOC gains due to SOC protection are balanced. We show that we can describe the temporal dynamics of SOC remarkably well (average and median R 2 = 0.75) in publicly available SOC time series from experiments that investigated the effects of agricultural practices in arable soils. The predictive power of our simplistic model is not meant to compete with that of current multi‐pool SOC models or recent developments that include microbial loops. The simplicity of our analysis can, however, show how the conceptual distinction between the forces that control SOC loss and gain, and their equilibrium, can shed light on SOC dynamics. Specifically, our analysis shows that, regardless of specific mechanisms, the persistence of SOC will depend on the ultimate equilibrium between SOC gains and losses, which may depend on environmental (e.g. temperature) and ecological (e.g. spatially structured microbial activities) factors and the relative roles of these factors. Future experimental studies should quantify these roles to formulate a new generation of SOC dynamics model.

Highlights

  • Soil plays an essential role in the global carbon (C) cycle acting as both a source and sink of organic C (Bender, Wagg, & van der Heijden, 2016; Lal, 2004, 2008; Osuri et al, 2016; Schuur et al, 2015)

  • We aimed to show that assumptions of the soil continuum model can be translated into quantitative models that, in contrast to tradi‐ tional soil organic carbon (SOC) pool models, invoke neither a chemical stabilization nor the variable recalcitrance of discrete soil organic matter (SOM) pools

  • We first test whether the model can accurately describe the temporal variation of SOC starting from the idea that the temporal variation of SOC loss and gain rates are func‐ tions of SOC amounts (Six, Conant, Paul, & Paustian, 2002). We show with this simple model that invokes neither recalci‐ trance nor distinct pools of SOC, that SOC persistence results from the ultimate equilibrium between SOC gains and losses, which may depend on environmental and eco‐ logical factors and the relative roles of these factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil plays an essential role in the global carbon (C) cycle acting as both a source and sink of organic C (Bender, Wagg, & van der Heijden, 2016; Lal, 2004, 2008; Osuri et al, 2016; Schuur et al, 2015). 2008; Bond‐Lamberty, Bailey, Chen, Gough, & Vargas, 2018; Cotrufo, Wallenstein, Boot, Denef, & Paul, 2013; Lal, 2004) Such a source‐sink switch could be brought about by a change in the physical and chemical state of soil, and through changes in soil biota and their interactions with plants (Bender et al, 2016; Davidson & Janssens, 2006; Osuri et al, 2016). Soil biota plays a pivotal role in soil C dynamics, especially in relation to stabi‐ lization of soil organic matter (SOM) and persistence of soil organic C (SOC)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call