Abstract

A study on successful and un-successful about 210 large software (development) projects from around the world between February 1995 and December 2017 has been presented in this review paper. All these projects involved on mass level that completed on time with their scheduled expense, and time frame estimates in development of those are getting late as defined, much expensive as decide, or were get delayed or close without its completion, major seven hurdles were noted: un sufficient project planning, un sufficient cost estimating, un sufficient measurements, un sufficient milestone tracking, un sufficient change control, and un sufficient -quality control, Poor Coronation and communication. After detail study on past reviews on these hurdles in project management, in this review paper we have presented a short overview of success and failure reasons/causes/possibilities of all those seven factor/ hurdles are noted. Maybe the clearest aspect of these major problems is linked with project management rather than technical resource. Two occupied ideas combine which are no proper excellence regulator are the huge funder for the rates, and late time and unfair plan organization have number of prospective reason of insufficient excellence actions.

Highlights

  • This review paper is resulting as the observation of about 210 major and productive software’s projects those are working National/International at or more than 15,000 points in capacity that reviewed by amongst 1995 to 2017 [1]

  • Project management techniques are useful, owing to its programming power and assigned connected problems, code needs extra functionalities to be underneath full control

  • Project management techniques working on itself way and many practices/systems were developed by the different software houses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This review paper is resulting as the observation of about 210 major and productive software’s projects those are working National/International at or more than 15,000 points in capacity that reviewed by amongst 1995 to 2017 [1]. Neither do these general software project/systems management techniques manage quality related issues like defect removal power. Project management techniques are useful, owing to its programming power and assigned connected problems, code needs extra functionalities to be underneath full control.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.