Sociology as a Science

Abstract

the spirit and methods of modern science, but at the same time they illustrate a philosophical approach to the problems in their fields. However, it is invidious to mention names, for many others might be cited whose work illustrates equally well the open-minded, but critical scientific approach, which overlaps with philosophical procedure. This protest against too narrow a view of scientific method in the social sciences would not be needed if there were not in certain circles a disposition to erect this view into an orthodoxy. Now, orthodoxies in the history of thought, whether in the field of religion, politics, or philosophy, have invariably proved in the long run to be impediments to progress. There is no reason to think that the result will be different in the social sciences. If we wish the social sciences to develop normally, if we do not wish them to become sterile and die, we must keep orthodoxies in their methodology from getting a hold. Rather our attitude must be the pragmatic one of welcoming any method which will yield truth that will work. Scientific methodology is not a closed science. It is a growing one, and it needs to preserve the experimental attitude must as much as any other science. Moreover, if the social sciences are to progress, we need to keep the mind of youthful students not only open but adventurous; not bound by physicalscience traditions, but eager to discover new knowledge by any methods which trained human intelligence can follow.