Abstract
While great improvements have been made in women’s professional advancement in sociology, it is contended that enormous sexism remains in sociological theory books, and the courses (often compulsory) associated with them. This has a broad effect in all fields within sociology, giving students the impression that men are the sources (the only in earlier times). Women are included only late, in contemporary sociology and gender studies. Classical theory textbooks in use over the last 25 years were examined, some in many editions. The trend has been for women to be added in later editions, but with scant or no discussion of their views or comparison with those of men theorists. Well-known women may be included (Rosa Parks, Hilary Clinton) who are not theorists at all! Yet an adequate literature has been available for many years-books by women theorists and analyses of them by reputable scholars. Two tables are provided: one, a chronological list of these works (to dispel the excuse of lack of material), the second (alphabetical), of sexist classical theory textbooks. Finally, it is argued that this is a challenge for the profession itself, authors, publishers, and peer reviewers. Inclusion and competence are both called for.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call