Socio-legal significance of interaction of bodies ofpre-trial proceedingsin disclosure and investigation of crimes

Dilrabo Karimova

doi:10.47689/2181-1415-vol1-iss3-pp98-106

Abstract

The author of the article reveals the socio-legal conditionality of implementation of interaction between the bodies of pre-trial proceedings in the activity of disclosing and investigating committed crimes. The urgency of studying the essence and meaning of this interaction is substantiated. The concept of interaction is considered from the point of view of different branches of knowledge. The opinions and views of domestic and foreign scientists regarding the concept and meaning of interaction, both a social phenomenon and a legal category, implying conscious, coordinated, joint and purposeful actions of bodies of pre-trial proceedings are analyzed. The author’s definition of the concept of interaction between the bodies of pre-trial proceedings is given. The author states the unsatisfactory state of interaction of the bodies of pre-trial proceedings, in particular, interrogators, investigators with the bodies carrying out pre-investigation checks and operational-search activity based on the sociological studies carried out on organization of activities for the disclosure, investigation of crimes and the search for persons hiding from the court and investigation. The author sees the solution to these problems in strengthening the effective measures of law enforcement agencies in combating crime, active and effective use of possibilities of criminal procedural and operational search activities.

Highlights

At present, crime, developing in parallel with society, complicates the effectiveness of ensuring the safety of citizens, protecting their rights and freedoms from criminal encroachments
An analysis of the organization of activities for the disclosure, investigation of crimes and the search for persons hiding from the court and investigation indicates the unsatisfactory state of interaction of the bodies of pre-trial proceedings, in particular, interrogators, investigators with the bodies carrying out pre-investigation checks and operational-search activities
The socio-legal significance of interaction of the bodies of pre-trial proceedings lies in the fact that in the fight against crime it provides: ‒ coordination of forces and means of bodies that, in accordance with procedural legislation, have the capabilities to carry out a particular activity; ‒ concentration of forces and means to fight the most serious crimes, including interregional and international crimes; ‒ timely detection of signs of crimes, their quick disclosure, initiation, investigation of criminal cases, as well as ensuring the protection of individual rights and freedoms from unlawful encroachments

Summary

Introduction

Crime, developing in parallel with society, complicates the effectiveness of ensuring the safety of citizens, protecting their rights and freedoms from criminal encroachments. Issues of improving the international and national mechanisms in the world, aimed at ensuring mutual and departmental interaction of law enforcement agencies in prevention, disclosure and investigation of crimes presuppose deep systemic and research work in this direction. Generalization of the achievements in finding solutions to problems related to procedural theory and judicial-investigative practice of interaction is important; understanding the essence and meaning, precise definition of the rights and obligations of subjects of interaction, development of its mechanism, ensuring effective interaction of pre-trial proceedings in the rapid, full disclosure and objective, qualitative investigation of the crimes committed. The President of Uzbekistan, critically assessing the activities of the internal affairs bodies, points to serious shortcomings in the research activity, especially to the currently observed insufficient degree of organization of interaction in the lower divisions of law enforcement agencies [1]. In the Action Strategy for five priority areas of development of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2017-2021 to ensure the rule of law and further liberalization of the judicial and legal system, it is determined “to increase the efficiency of coordinating activities in the fight against crime and prevention of offenses” [2]

Methods

Results

Conclusion