SocialNetworks and Its Use in School-Based Settings

Abstract

No AccessPerspectives on School-Based IssuesArticle1 Dec 2005SocialNetworks and Its Use in School-Based Settings Sarah W. Blackstone Sarah W. Blackstone Augmentative Communication, Inc.Monterey, CA Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sbi6.4.13 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Albrecht, M. B., & Adelman, T. L. (1987). Communication networks as structure of social support..T. L Adelman & M. B Albrecht (Eds.), Communicating social support (pp. 40–64). London: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues..Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. Google Scholar Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication.. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Blackstone, S. W., & Hunt Berg, M. (2002). Social Networks: An Assessment and Intervention Planning Inventory for Individuals with Complex Communication Needs and Their Communication Partners (SN)..Monterey, CA: Augmentative Communication. Google Scholar Blackstone, S. W. (2005). The coming of age transition..Augmentative Communication News, 17,1. Google Scholar Blackstone, S., Hunt Berg, M., & Wilkins, D.(in press). Measuring the impact of AAC across disability types and ages using social networks as a component of measurement..S. vonTetzchner &M. deJ. Goncalves(Eds.), Theoretical and methodological challenges for research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Toronto, Canada: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Google Scholar Bryen, D. N.,Carey, A., & Frantz, B. (2003). Ending the silence: Adults who use augmentative communication and their experiences as victims of crimes..Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19,125–134. Google Scholar Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language..Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Collier, B. (2000). Communicating matters: A training guide for personal attendants working with consumers who have enhanced communication needs..Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Fried-Oken, M., & Bersani, H.A. (2000). Speaking up and spelling it out..Brookes. Google Scholar Golinker L. (2005, April). Social networks and individuals with neurological challenges: Measurable and reimbursable differences..Presentation at CSHA, Santa Clara, CA. Google Scholar Granlund, M., & Schlosser, R. (2004). The concept participation—Definitions and applications in interventions and services for persons with disability..Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Granlund, M.,Eriksson, L., & Ylven, R.(2004). The utility of the ICF participation dimension in assigning ICF codes to items from extant rating instruments..Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,, 36,130–137. Google Scholar Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication..New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Kaczmarek, L. A. (2002). Assessment of social-communicative competence: An interdisiplinary model..H. GoldsteinL. A. Kaczmarek, & K. M. English(Eds.), Promoting social communication (pp. 55–115). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Light, J. C., & Binger, C. (1998). Building communicative competence with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication..Baltimore: PaulH. Brookes. Google Scholar Robertson, J.,Emerson, E.,Gregory, N.,Hatton, C.,Kessissoglou, S.,Hallam, A., & Linehan, C. (2001). Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential..Mental Retardation, 39, 201–214. Google Scholar Rogers, E., & Kinkaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks..New York:The Free Press. Google Scholar Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alterantive communication..Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68. Google Scholar Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Outcomes measurement in augmentative and alternative communication..J. LightJ. Reichle, & D. Beukelman (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 479–513). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Google Scholar Schlosser, R., & Braun, U. (1994). Efficacy of AAC interventions: Methodological issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects..A ugmentative and Alternative Communication, 10,207–223. Google Scholar Scott, J., & Murphy, J. (1995). Attitudes and Strategies towards AAC: An interactive approach to training..Widening the perspective—Augmentative communication in practice: Scottish study day. Scotland: CALL Centre. Google Scholar Wilkins, D. P. (2004a, March). Psycholinguists considerations in representation selection for communicative interaction: Why it is interactions that are impaired not individuals..Paper presented to the Department of Special Education and Communicative Disorders,, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Google Scholar Wilkins, D. P. (2004b). Going beyond language structure to multimodal usage: Rethinking the considerations for representation selection in AAC..Manuscript in preparation. Google Scholar Williams, M. B., & Krezman, C. (2000). Beneath the surface: Creative expressions of augmented communicators..Toronto: ISAAC Press. Google Scholar World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health..Geneva: Author. Google Scholar Yorkston, K.,Klasner, E., & Swanson, K. (2001). Communication in context: A qualitative study of the experiences of individuals with Multiple Sclerosis..American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 126–137. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 6Issue 4December 2005Pages: 13-16 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Dec 1, 2005 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesleader-topicsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...