Social roles of artificial intelligence. Part 2. Artificial intelligence systems in scientific research and medical practice

Abstract

The relevance. The rate of spread of artificial systems with intelligence is increasing every year. This is evidenced by a large number of scientific publications, patents, research in this area and support for government programs. However, the ambiguity of its use in science and in practice leaves AI the subject of heated discussions both in the humanitarian community and among scientists who use artificial intelligence technologies in their professional activities.The purpose of the article is to analyze the role of artificial systems with intelligence in scientific and professional, and specifically, medical practice.Objectives: to study digital technologies with elements of artificial intelligence used in science and high-tech practices, their potential and risks; to identify a number of social roles that can be assigned to programs with elements of intelligence as assistants to scientists; to show the possibilities and risks of introducing AI into medical practice.Methodology. As the main approach to solving the tasks set, the article uses an interdisciplinary synthesis of philosophical reflections, statistics and the results of the practical application of AI in healthcare, which allows highlighting the anthropological and social problems of the rapid introduction of new technologies into the social sphere.Results. This article examines healthcare as an environment for the rapid introduction of AI into all system processes, from diagnosis to management of medical complexes. The possible roles of AIS as an assistant manager, analyst, consultant and qualified colleague in modern technology-oriented healthcare are shown.Conclusions. When using AI in scientific work and professional practices, it is possible to identify pragmatic, psychological and ethical aspects. Problems were found not only in the disclosure of confidential information about patients, but also in more serious shortcomings related to the effectiveness of the organization of healthcare as a social practice and the loss of important professional competencies of practitioners.