Abstract

BackgroundTerms and conditions define the relationship between social media companies and users. However, these legal agreements are long and written in a complex language. It remains questionable whether users understand the terms and conditions and are aware of the consequences of joining such a network. With children from a young age interacting with social media, companies are acquiring large amounts of data, resulting in longitudinal data sets that most researchers can only dream of. The use of social media by children is highly relevant to their mental and physical health for 2 reasons: their health can be adversely affected by social media and their data can be used to conduct health research.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to offer an ethical analysis of how the most common social media apps and services inform users and obtain their consent regarding privacy and other issues and to discuss how lessons from research ethics can lead to trusted partnerships between users and social media companies. Our paper focuses on children, who represent a sensitive group among users of social media platforms.MethodsA thematic analysis of the terms and conditions of the 20 most popular social media platforms and the 2 predominant mobile phone ecosystems (Android and iOS) was conducted. The results of this analysis served as the basis for scoring these platforms.ResultsThe analysis showed that most platforms comply with the age requirements issued by legislators. However, the consent process during sign-up was not taken seriously. Terms and conditions are often too long and difficult to understand, especially for younger users. The same applies to age verification, which is not realized proactively but instead relies on other users who report underaged users.ConclusionsThis study reveals that social media networks are still lacking in many respects regarding the adequate protection of children. Consent procedures are flawed because they are too complex, and in some cases, children can create social media accounts without sufficient age verification or parental oversight. Adopting measures based on key ethical principles will safeguard the health and well-being of children. This could mean standardizing the registration process in accordance with modern research ethics procedures: give users the key facts that they need in a format that can be read easily and quickly, rather than forcing them to wade through chapters of legal language that they cannot understand. Improving these processes would help safeguard the mental health of children and other social media users.

Highlights

  • BackgroundSocial media companies have experienced tremendous growth during the last decade; they have largely neglected the issues of privacy and confidentiality

  • This paper provides an ethical analysis of the most popular social media platforms and services used by children and adolescents

  • Our analysis reveals that social media networks are still lacking in many respects with regard to adequate protection for children

Read more

Summary

Introduction

BackgroundSocial media companies have experienced tremendous growth during the last decade; they have largely neglected the issues of privacy and confidentiality. With children and young adults using social media apps from a young age, companies have acquired data over long time spans, which is similar to longitudinal data used in research Keeping this in mind and knowing that predictive algorithms will become more accurate, it is of major importance to build governance and inform users about the use of their data to foster data protection. Adopting measures based on key ethical principles will safeguard the health and well-being of children This could mean standardizing the registration process in accordance with modern research ethics procedures: give users the key facts that they need in a format that can be read and quickly, rather than forcing them to wade through chapters of legal language that they cannot understand. By peer or Yes (mail) Consent by Yes birthday can user be changed only a limited number of times By peer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call