Abstract

Social species form organizations that support individuals because the consequent social behaviors help these organisms survive. The isolation of these individuals may be a stressor. We reviewed the potential mechanisms of the effects of social isolation on cholinergic signaling and vice versa how changes in cholinergic signaling affect changes due to social isolation.There are two important problems regarding this topic. First, isolation schemes differ in their duration (1–165 days) and initiation (immediately after birth to adulthood). Second, there is an important problem that is generally not considered when studying the role of the cholinergic system in neurobehavioral correlates: muscarinic and nicotinic receptor subtypes do not differ sufficiently in their affinity for orthosteric site agonists and antagonists. Some potential cholinesterase inhibitors also affect other targets, such as receptors or other neurotransmitter systems. Therefore, the role of the cholinergic system in social isolation should be carefully considered, and multiple receptor systems may be involved in the central nervous system response, although some subtypes are involved in specific functions. To determine the role of a specific receptor subtype, the presence of a specific subtype in the central nervous system should be determined using search in knockout studies with the careful application of specific agonists/antagonists.

Highlights

  • A number of species, including humans and other mammals, such as rodents, are social animals

  • The ACh content was increased in the diencephalon of mouse-killing rats after social isolation (Yoshimura and Ueki, 1977)

  • An increase in choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity was found in the nucleus accumbens

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A number of species, including humans and other mammals, such as rodents, are social animals. Other effects of social isolation include changes in learning (Petkov and Rousseva, 1984; Wongwitdecha and Marsden, 1996; Ouchi et al, 2013), anxiety (Cheeta et al, 2001), adaptation to a strong sensory stimulus (e.g., prepulse inhibition (Shao et al, 2014)), and communication, e.g., ultrasonic vocalization in rodents (Branchi et al, 2004) All of these functions are connected with the cholinergic system, which is widely associated with learning and memory (see Wongwitdecha and Marsden, 1996 for initial consideration), including conditional fear memory (Okada et al, 2015).

4.55–6.72 NMDAε2
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.