Abstract

Social insects vigorously defend their nests against con- and heterospecific competitors. Collective defense is also seen at highly profitable food sources. Aggressive responses are elicited or promoted by several means of communication, e.g. alarm pheromones and other chemical markings. In this study, we demonstrate that the social environment and interactions among colony members (nestmates) modulates the propensity to engage in aggressive behavior and therefore plays an important role in allocating workers to a defense task. We kept Formica rufa workers in groups or isolated for different time spans and then tested their aggressiveness in one-on-one encounters with other ants. In groups of more than 20 workers that are freely interacting, individuals are aggressive in one-on-one encounters with non-nestmates, whereas aggressiveness of isolated workers decreases with increasing isolation time. We conclude that ants foraging collectively and interacting frequently, e.g. along foraging trails and at profitable food sources, remain in a social context and thereby maintain high aggressiveness against potential competitors. Our results suggest that the nestmate recognition system can be utilized at remote sites for an adaptive and flexible tuning of the response against competitors.

Highlights

  • Securing resources often requires active defense against competing con- and heterospecifics

  • Irrespective of separation time, the median number of interactions was very similar across the groups (social-FW vs NM: 8.5, quartile range (QR): 5–15; social-FW vs NNM: 10, QR: 7–18; isolated-FW vs NNM: 12, QR: 6–16)

  • We investigated how the social environment modulates aggression, and we show that a social environment maintains or generates a worker’s context that facilitates an aggressive response against potential competitors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Securing resources often requires active defense against competing con- and heterospecifics. In response to a threat, guarding and defending workers may use alarm pheromones to recruit nestmates [10,11,12]. In this scenario, perceiving the alarm pheromone influences the internal physiological state of the receiver (aggression context), making it more likely for the receiver to respond with aggression towards unfamiliar objects and intruders [11].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.