Abstract

How does the participation of students with special educational needs (SEN) in mainstream education affect their social inclusion? We introduce a single-item pictorial measure, the Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS), to compare the social inclusion of SEN students attending mainstream regular schools to social inclusion of SEN students attending special schools. We collected responses from 138 parents of SEN students aged 4–20, to obtain data on the loneliness, friendships and social inclusion of SEN students. The parents of SEN students attending regular schools did not perceive their children to be less included than parents of SEN students attending special schools. School context decreased SEN students’ perceived loneliness independent of the school type. And while most SEN students’ friendships were formed at school, SEN students attending regular schools had more friends, and these were more likely to live in the same neighborhood. Overall, the social inclusion of SEN students across school types was not affected by the school type, only by the school’s inclusive characteristics.

Highlights

  • The participation of students with special educational needs (SEN) in regular schools is frequently disputed on the grounds that their social inclusion is failing

  • Most of the responses referred to one of the three least-overlapping circles, with 63% of SEN students from special schools and 46% of SEN students from regular schools associated with these three lowest levels of inclusion

  • A Mann-Whitney test indicated that IOS did not significantly differ for SEN students attending regular schools (Mdn = 3) and for those attending special schools (Mdn = 3), U(Nregular = 70, Nspecial = 64) = 1967.5, p = 0.217

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The participation of students with special educational needs (SEN) in regular schools is frequently disputed on the grounds that their social inclusion is failing. SEN students in regular schools were identified as being more lonely than their non-SEN classmates [1,2,3], having fewer friends and interactions with peers [4,5,6], and being more likely to be bullied [7]. These concerns arise from studies comparing SEN students to non-SEN students, using measures of social inclusion that are based on sociometric methods and observational data.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call