Abstract
This study aims to find that high integrity is to break away from personal roles and public roles, starting with the selection of places they develop intellectuals in the anti-corruption movement. So they choose a place that can accommodate the minds of those who are anti-mainstream and dare to get out of their comfort zones and enter into a system to change the system, even though at risk they will become isolated individuals, unpopular and always in a separate space. For those who from the beginning chose the area of power and politics gave rise to two groups of intellectuals, namely the group that still wishes to carry out anti-corruption thinking and groups that merge into corruptors. The ethical dilemma for groups in the area of the anti-corruption movement is lighter because the ethical dilemma is in his role. While the groups in the field of power and politics are more massive because some can only see and experience extraordinary shock until stressed but cannot report it, some others fall into the world of corruption.
Highlights
The form of the relationship between the government, intellectual figures, and society in the life of the nation and state has long existed
Intellectual consciousness roles are meant more by the position that is owned as a change agent in developing the country, with brilliant ideas, which can be beneficial to society
Intellectual sociology reveals that in society, intellectuals are always faced with an ethical dilemma of choices that favor power, are conservative and allergic to change, choose a position to be ever critical and autonomous and independent of the government [2]
Summary
The form of the relationship between the government, intellectual figures, and society in the life of the nation and state has long existed. Of all the previous studies, it seems only to see the role of intellectuals from the perspective of characters when intellectuals enter the system and intellectuals tend to change and choose to become a corruptor when dealing with the system or even become the leading actor of corruptors. These studies have not been able to swoop sharply to see why intellectual groups can experience change or why intellectual consciousness is changing. This is where the position of this study is significant to fill the space or gap to see an consciousness in the dilemma role of intellectual groups
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
