Abstract

The article considers the features of the political field of strong and weak power, and social institutions and structures that influence the transformation process. The authors propose a new reading of the concept of political field, and its main characteristics are the status roles of subjects, configuration of space, nature of the relationship of opposing forces, and methods for preserving the priorities of the opposing subjects. The article identifies interaction problems between the government and the opposition, mechanisms of power retention, tendencies and prospects for the development of the political field of weak and strong power under crises, global instability and government mistakes that lead to dramatic changes in the public opinion. The authors note that clashes in the political field restructure the political space in a new way, which is due to both peculiarities of the historical development and the social-economic and political situation. Transformations of the post-Soviet world are not complete, and the transition of post-Soviet countries to the sustainable development is possible only by adaptation to new realities. The peculiarity of the political field is the constant confrontation of its subjects: the more unstable the political field, the higher the unpredictability of events and the role of the leader. In the contemporary state, there is always a danger of destabilization due to information wars and new forms of influence on the mass consciousness, values and behavior. The empirical basis of the article are monitoring sociological studies conducted from 1987 to identify the level of social tension and political stability, fullness of the political space, rankings of politicians, etc.

Highlights

  • [3] Danilov A.N., Rotman D.G

  • Политическое поле — это пространство, в котором происходит борьба за власть

  • Даже такие ценности и социокультурные приоритеты, как сохранение национального суверенитета, упрочение политической стабильности, укрепление правопорядка, либерализация экономических отношений, повышение роли государства как гаранта успешных социальных преобразований, трактуются на политическом поле разными силами и группами по-разному, исходя из стратегических целей

Read more

Summary

Introduction

[3] Danilov A.N., Rotman D.G. Prioritet myagkoy sily v destabilizatsii sovremennogo sotsiuma (na primere Respubliki Belarus) [The priority of soft power in the destabilization of the contemporary society (on the example of the Republic of Belarus)]. Что столкновения на политическом поле по-новому форматируют политическое пространство, что обусловлено как особенностями исторического развития, так и социально-экономической и политической ситуацией. Особенность политического поля — постоянное противостояние его субъектов: чем неустойчивее политическое поле, чем выше непредсказуемость событий и роль лидера как носителя высшей власти.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call