Abstract

This article rejects the idea that the sociology of mental illness classification and organizational embeddedness shows that mental illness is a pure social construct. The three styles of social construction include pure constructionism, interactive social construction, and harmful dysfunction (HD) conception. Because mental illnesses are social artifacts, they cannot be universal. Interactive conceptions of mental disorder illustrate the effects of social classification through situating them within institutional practices, social meanings, and interactions. The HD view offers the grounds for critiquing mental health practices. The HD analysis shows that the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders definitions pervasively confuse problematic but natural human emotions which develop as responses to stress with mental disorders. The profound social influences on constructions of mental disorder reveal the value of sociological approaches for the study of phenomena that are typically viewed as aspects of individual personalities and brains.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.