Abstract

The author provides a personal history of efforts to define mental disorder in the various editions of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Weary from his own efforts, as a psychiatric nosologist, to define “mental disorder,” and unsure about the importance of having a consensus definition (there is none for medical disorder), the author regards Wakefield's “harmful dysfunction” construct as a brilliant breakthrough. Wake-field's definition clarifies the underlying issues while the author believes that Ossario's definition muddles the issues.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.