Abstract

In social animals, group living may impact the risk of infectious disease acquisition in two ways. On the one hand, social connectedness puts individuals at greater risk or susceptibility for acquiring enteric pathogens via contact-mediated transmission. Yet conversely, in strongly bonded societies like humans and some nonhuman primates, having close connections and strong social ties of support can also socially buffer individuals against susceptibility or transmissibility of infectious agents. Using social network analyses, we assessed the potentially competing roles of contact-mediated transmission and social buffering on the risk of infection from an enteric bacterial pathogen (Shigella flexneri) among captive groups of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Our results indicate that, within two macaque groups, individuals possessing more direct and especially indirect connections in their grooming and huddling social networks were less susceptible to infection. These results are in sharp contrast to several previous studies that indicate that increased (direct) contact-mediated transmission facilitates infectious disease transmission, including our own findings in a third macaque group in which individuals central in their huddling network and/or which initiated more fights were more likely to be infected. In summary, our findings reveal that an individual’s social connections may increase or decrease its chances of acquiring infectious agents. They extend the applicability of the social buffering hypothesis, beyond just stress and immune-function-related health benefits, to the additional health outcome of infectious disease resistance. Finally, we speculate that the circumstances under which social buffering versus contact-mediated transmission may occur could depend on multiple factors, such as living condition, pathogen-specific transmission routes, and/or an overall social context such as a group’s social stability.

Highlights

  • In humans and other animals, the strength and diversity of social relationships strongly influence the risk of acquiring infectious diseases (Alexander, 1974; Drewe & Perkins, 2015; McCowan et al, 2016; Nunn, 2012)

  • In Group III, we found that Shigella infection was most prevalent among individuals that were involved in more aggressive interactions and/or more central in their huddling networks, suggesting contact-mediated transmission

  • In regards to infectious disease susceptibility, increased social connections among group members may either facilitate the acquisition and transmission of pathogens via social contact (Drewe, 2010; Drewe & Perkins, 2015; Freeland, 1976; Loehle, 1995; MacIntosh et al, 2012), or may inhibit such acquisition via socially buffering individuals against daily stressors to reduce the risk of environmental acquisition of pathogens (Cohen et al, 2015; Hennessy, Kaiser & Sachser, 2009; Kaplan et al, 1991; Young et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In humans and other animals, the strength and diversity of social relationships strongly influence the risk of acquiring infectious diseases (Alexander, 1974; Drewe & Perkins, 2015; McCowan et al, 2016; Nunn, 2012). In addition to life-history traits of the host, biology of the pathogen, and the degree of contact with contaminated environmental sources (Drewe & Perkins, 2015; Kappeler, Cremer & Nunn, 2015), social connections with group conspecifics may influence the risk of acquiring and/or transmitting a pathogen (Drewe & Perkins, 2015). To better understand the impact of social life on disease risk, it is necessary to characterize the potentially competing impacts of both greater contact-mediated transmission and social buffering on susceptibility to, and transmission of pathogens

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call