Abstract
We desire a simple comparison of the absolute effective areas of the current generation of CCD instruments onboard the following observatories: Chandra ACIS-S3, XMM-Newton (EPIC-MOS and EPIC-pn), Suzaku XIS, and Swift XRT and a straightforward comparison of the time-dependent response of these instruments across their respective mission lifetimes. We have been using 1E 0102.2-7219, the brightest supernova remnant in the Small Magellanic Cloud, to evaluate and modify the response models of these instruments. 1E 0102.2-7219 has strong lines of O, Ne, and Mg below 1.5 keV and little or no Fe emission to complicate the spectrum. As part of the activities of the International Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC), we have developed a standard spectral model for 1E 0102.2-7219. The model is empirical in that it includes Gaussians for the identified lines, an absorption component in the Galaxy, another absorption component in the SMC, and two thermal continuum components. In our fits, the model is highly constrained in that only the normalizations of the four brightest lines/line complexes (the O vii He$\alpha$ triplet, O viii Ly$\alpha$ line, the Ne ix He$\alpha$ triplet, and the Ne x Ly$\alpha$ line) and an overall normalization are allowed to vary. We have examined these measured line fluxes as a function of time for each instrument after applying the most recent calibrations that account for the time-dependent response of each instrument. We perform our effective area comparison with representative, early mission data when the radiation damage and contamination layers were at a minimum. We find that the measured fluxes of these lines generally agree to within +/-10% for all instruments, with 38 of our 48 fitted normalizations within +/-10% of the IACHEC model value.
Highlights
This paper reports the progress of a working group within the International Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC) to develop a calibration standard for X-ray astronomy in the bandpass from 0.3 to 1.5 keV
We have compared the fitted line normalizations of the O vii Heα r line, the O viii Lyα line, the Ne ix Heα r line, and Ne x Ly α line to examine the consistency of the effective area models for the various instruments in the energy ranges around 570 eV, 654 eV, 915 eV, and 1022 eV
We find that the scaled line normalizations agree with the IACHEC model normalization to within ±9% & ±12% for the Ne ix Heα r and Ne x Lyα line complexes when all instruments are considered
Summary
This paper reports the progress of a working group within the International Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration (IACHEC) to develop a calibration standard for X-ray astronomy in the bandpass from 0.3 to 1.5 keV. Our working group was tasked with selecting celestial sources with line-rich spectra in the 0.3−1.5 keV bandpass which would be suitable cross-calibration targets for the current generation of. The desire for strong lines in this bandpass stems from the fact that the quantum efficiency and spectral resolution of the current CCD-based instruments is changing rapidly from 0.3 to 1.5 keV but the on-board calibration sources currently in use typically have strong lines at only two energies, 1.5 keV (Al Kα) and 5.9 keV (Mn Kα). The only option available to the current generation of flight instruments to calibrate possible time variable responses in this bandpass is to use celestial sources. The missions which have been represented in this work are the Chandra X-ray Observatory (Weisskopf et al 2000, 2002), the X-ray Multimirror Mission
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have