Abstract

BackgroundThe crisis of Misidentified and contaminated cell lines have plagued the biological research community for decades. Some repositories and journals have heeded calls for mandatory authentication of human cell lines, yet misidentification of mouse cell lines has received little publicity despite their importance in sponsored research. Short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is the standard authentication method, but it may fail to distinguish cell lines derived from the same inbred strain of mice. Additionally, STR profiling does not reveal karyotypic changes that occur in some high-passage lines and may have functional consequences. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling has been suggested as a more accurate and versatile alternative to STR profiling; however, a high-throughput method for SNP-based authentication of mouse cell lines has not been described.ResultsWe have developed computational methods (Cell Line Authentication by SNP Profiling, CLASP) for cell line authentication and copy number analysis based on a cost-efficient SNP array, and we provide a reference database of commonly used mouse strains and cell lines. We show that CLASP readily discriminates among cell lines of diverse taxonomic origins, including multiple cell lines derived from a single inbred strain, intercross or wild caught mouse. CLASP is also capable of detecting contaminants present at concentrations as low as 5%. Of the 99 cell lines we tested, 15 exhibited substantial divergence from the reported genetic background. In all cases, we were able to distinguish whether the authentication failure was due to misidentification (one cell line, Ba/F3), the presence of multiple strain backgrounds (five cell lines), contamination by other cells and/or the presence of aneuploid chromosomes (nine cell lines).ConclusionsMisidentification and contamination of mouse cell lines is potentially as widespread as it is in human cell culture. This may have substantial implications for studies that are dependent on the expected background of their cell cultures. Laboratories can mitigate these risks by regular authentication of their cell cultures. Our results demonstrate that SNP array profiling is an effective method to combat cell line misidentification.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-847) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The crisis of Misidentified and contaminated cell lines have plagued the biological research community for decades

  • MegaMUGA is available commercially, and will soon transition to the third-generation GigaMUGA array (144 k markers) that is under development (JPD, FPMV, Andrew P Morgan, Leonard McMillan, Ping Fu, Katy Kao unpublished)

  • Development of an assay for mouse cell line authentication We developed an R package called Cell Line Authentication by Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Profiling (CLASP, Additional file 4), which is described in the Methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The crisis of Misidentified and contaminated cell lines have plagued the biological research community for decades. Short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is the standard authentication method, but it may fail to distinguish cell lines derived from the same inbred strain of mice. Multiplex short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is the current standard for authentication of human cell lines [6], and has been recently applied to the mouse [7]. While these assays are capable of discriminating between genetically distinct individuals and inbred strains, the long-term stability of STRs in cultured cells is in question [8]. We describe a comprehensive and cost-efficient SNP-based solution to the problems of mouse cell line misidentification, crosscontamination and copy number aberration

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call