Abstract
In recent years, the continued improvement and deployment of smartphone technology has resulted in the growth of smartphone sensor systems. Citizen science projects that require on-the-spot measurement of a variety of parameters such as illuminance and sound level may benefit from this new technology. As yet, there have been few attempts at critically assessing these sensor systems and their accuracy. I calibrated the light and sound sensors on a variety of apps and on three platforms using professional-grade instruments. Provided that modest adjustments to the recorded data are made using a small set of calibration curves, the usefulness of smartphone sensor light and sound systems for conducting citizen science experiments can be dramatically improved. Light intensity measurements for illuminances above 5,000 lx can be made with ±12% accuracy compared with calibrated values, and sound intensity measurements from 35 to 90 dB can be made to within ±1.5 dB. A significant failing among the light-metering apps is that none of them save the measurements in exportable file formats for later analysis. This greatly limits the usefulness of these apps for non-photographic applications. I conclude that, when proper measurement and calibration protocols are applied, smartphone sensors can indeed generate relatively high-quality data using their light and sound sensors within restricted measurement ranges. These calibrated measurements compare well with professional-grade, calibrated systems, but at far lower cost. This opens the door for a new generation of citizen science and crowdsourced applications involving the monitoring of light and sound values.
Highlights
Given that designing mobile platforms for specific citizen science project needs can cost tens of thousands of dollars, according to Yarmosh (2017), the ubiquity of smartphones makes them a highly desirable platform (Dehnen-Schmutz 2016)
This paper extends the work by Odenwald (2019) and investigates light and sound sensors to assess their accuracy and precision in comparison with professional instrumentation
A dedicated light sensor near the front camera is used by virtually all android apps, while iOS apps use data provided by the back camera and written into the exchangeable image file formal (EXIF) data stream for the scenery being imaged
Summary
Given that designing mobile platforms for specific citizen science project needs can cost tens of thousands of dollars, according to Yarmosh (2017), the ubiquity of smartphones makes them a highly desirable platform (Dehnen-Schmutz 2016). Odenwald (2019) examined how modern smartphone magnetism and radiation sensors available since 2015 performed against professionally-calibrated systems. This knowledge was applied to using smartphones for the detection of geomagnetic storms (Odenwald 2018) and radiation doses at airline altitudes (Odenwald 2019). Similar radiation and magnetism measurements form the basis for citizen science projects such as Our Radioactive Ocean, and the previously mentioned project CrowdMag. This paper extends the work by Odenwald (2019) and investigates light and sound sensors to assess their accuracy and precision in comparison with professional instrumentation. The available literature on the rigorous calibration of these sensors is modest to nonexistent and in all cases is many years out of date as newer smartphones have entered the market
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have