Abstract

Urban energy transitions are key components of urgently requisite climate change mitigation. Promissory discourse accords smart grids pride of place within them. We employ a living lab to study smart grids as a solution geared towards upscaling and systematisation, investigate their limits as a climate change mitigation solution, and assess them rigorously as urban energy transitions. Our 18 month living lab simulates a household energy management platform in Bergen. Norway’s mitigation focus promotes smart meter roll-out as reducing carbon emissions, by (i) unlocking efficiency gains, and (ii) increasing awareness for demand-side management. We problematise this discourse. Raising awareness encounters intractable challenges for smart grid scalability. Scattered efficiency gains constitute modest increments rather than the substantial change requisite for rapid mitigation. Whereas promissory smart grid discourse overlooks these ground-truthed limits, our findings caution against misplaced expectations concerning mitigation. We contest discursive enthusiasm on smart grids and argue for aligning local and systemic concerns before upscaling to avoid obscuring risks. Scaling up requires understanding and addressing interdependencies and trade-offs across scales. Focus group discussions and surveys with living lab participants who used sub-meter monitors to track real-time household electricity consumption data over an extended period show that technical issues and energy behaviour, as well as political economic and policy structures and factors, pose significant limits to smart grids. Urban strategies for climate change mitigation must be informed by this recognition. Our results indicate that upscaling relies on bottom-up popular acceptance of the salient technical, organisational and standardisation measures, but that measures to improve the democratic legitimacy of and participation in energy transitions remain weak. We highlight limits to smart grids as a standalone urban mitigation solution and call for a sharper focus on accompanying thrust areas for systematisation and scalability, such as renewable energy integration and grid coordination.

Highlights

  • We employ a living lab to study smart grids as a solution geared towards upscaling and systematisation, investigate their limits as a climate change mitigation solution, and assess them rigorously as urban energy transitions

  • Focus group discussions and surveys with living lab participants who used sub-meter monitors to track real-time household electricity consumption data over an extended period show that technical issues and energy behaviour, as well as political economic and policy structures and factors, pose significant limits to smart grids

  • Our living lab approach points to the need and possibility of including energy users and publics, not as add-ons to a technocratic process, but as participants in key decisions concerning our common energy future. We argue that such ontological politics are key for climate change mitigation when upscaling smart grids in urban energy transitions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smart electricity agendas and imaginaries project an image of ‘users’ as prime beneficiaries Part of this agenda, here termed the promissory discourse on smart grids, assumes and emphasises a need for ‘behavioural change’ by users to facilitate more efficient energy consumption. Here termed the promissory discourse on smart grids, assumes and emphasises a need for ‘behavioural change’ by users to facilitate more efficient energy consumption Emerging scholarship challenges such characterisation by problematising what motivates people to engage in energy efficiency measures. Based on a multi-faceted empirical study, we show that expectations of and demands for behavioural change are not representative of current socio-technical developments. The discourse about the potential of smart grids for climate change mitigation promises too much; it must be corrected in order to examine and achieve their real potential

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call