Abstract

Velocity macromodel building is a crucial step in the seismic imaging workflow as it provides the necessary background model for migration or full waveform inversion. In this study, we present a new formulation of stereotomography that can handle more efficiently long-offset acquisition, complex geological structures and large-scale data sets. Stereotomography is a slope tomographic method based upon a semi-automatic picking of local coherent events. Each local coherent event, characterized by its two-way traveltime and two slopes in common-shot and common-receiver gathers, is tied to a scatterer or a reflector segment in the subsurface. Ray tracing provides a natural forward engine to compute traveltime and slopes but can suffer from non-uniform ray sampling in presence of complex media and long-offset acquisitions. Moreover, most implementations of stereotomography explicitly build a sensitivity matrix, leading to the resolution of large systems of linear equations, which can be cumbersome when large-scale data sets are considered. Overcoming these issues comes with a new matrix-free formulation of stereotomography: a factored eikonal solver based on the fast sweeping method to compute first-arrival traveltimes and an adjoint-state formulation to compute the gradient of the misfit function. By solving eikonal equation from sources and receivers, we make the computational cost proportional to the number of sources and receivers while it is independent of picked events density in each shot and receiver gather. The model space involves the subsurface velocities and the scatterer coordinates, while the dips of the reflector segments are implicitly represented by the spatial support of the adjoint sources and are updated through the joint localization of nearby scatterers. We present an application on the complex Marmousi model for a towed-streamer acquisition and a realistic distribution of local events. We show that the estimated model, built without any prior knowledge of the velocities, provides a reliable initial model for frequency-domain FWI of long-offset data for a starting frequency of 4 Hz, although some artefacts at the reservoir level result from a deficit of illumination. This formulation of slope tomography provides a computationally efficient alternative to waveform inversion method such as reflection waveform inversion or differential-semblance optimization to build an initial model for pre-stack depth migration and conventional FWI.

Highlights

  • Building a velocity macromodel from reflection data remains one of the most crucial and challenging issues in seismic imaging

  • In order to overcome these difficulties, we present a new formulation of stereotomography

  • We develop an adjoint formulation of the slope tomography as a new formulation of stereotomography to avoid large-scale matrix resolution

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Building a velocity macromodel from reflection data remains one of the most crucial and challenging issues in seismic imaging. Billette & Lambare (1998) extended the CDR method to stereotomography, which relies on a semi-automatic picking of traveltimes and slopes of local coherent events in both shot and receiver gathers. In our formulation, the state equations resulting from the use of a finite-difference eikonal solver as forward-modelling engine (eikonal equation and slope estimation from finite differences of traveltime maps) drive us towards a model space formed by the subsurface velocities and the coordinates of the scatterers This model space may be easier to manage than those used in ray-based stereotomography (Billette & Lambare 1998) because it involves a smaller number of parameter classes. We design a workflow along these lines, with different model parametrization and inversion implementation

ADJOINT SLOPE TOMOGRAPHY
Data and model space definition
Forward problem
Multiparameter inverse problem
Gradient computation with the adjoint-state method
Implementation of adjoint slope tomography in practice
SYNTHETIC EXAMPLES
Example 1: circular anomaly
Building velocity macromodel
FWI with initial model from adjoint slope tomography
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.