Abstract

In England, adjustments to policy in teacher education have had implications for how subject knowledge is understood and for how job descriptions are defined. That is, the interface between teacher educator and subject knowledge representation has been changing. This paper reports on a wider study that considers the experience of university teacher educators adjusting to new academic and operational conditions. On the one hand, the teacher educators are confronted with their subject specialism being set according to new learning objectives and to new time and curriculum constraints. On the other hand, their professional identity is reshaped in response to structural changes to teacher education where earlier job definitions had been reconfigured or removed. The paper analyses resultant conceptions of subject knowledge and of teacher education emerging through this changing interface and how these conceptions are variously located across staffing arrangements. A Lacanian model of subjectivity provides a theoretical approach to depicting teacher educator and pre‐service teacher identification with subject knowledge. The paper provides a theoretical account of how the teacher educator/trainee interface has been reshaped in line with the market‐led terminology that governs current practices. Specifically, the analytical tools enable us to dismantle and restructure the prevalent symbolic order guiding current teacher practice and understanding, particularly our entrapment within specific discourses and identity constructs that shape our interactions with subject knowledge.

Highlights

  • In England, adjustments to policy in teacher education have had implications for how subject knowledge is understood and for how job descriptions are defined

  • The paragraph provides a template for depicting teacher educator and trainee identification with subject knowledge from the point of view of how the teacher educator’s delivery has been reconfigured to meet the specific demands placed on trainees

  • The teacher educator and trainee each have an understanding of their own practice and of the subject knowledge with which they are associated

Read more

Summary

Representing curriculum subjects

We shall focus on how subject knowledge has changed and on how teacher educator embodiments of subject knowledge have altered as a result of newly defined job descriptions reconfiguring different areas of subject knowledge. Attitudes to research derived from the teacher educator’s relative alignment with the discourses of governing, educating, protesting or revolutionising It was suggested by Lacan (2007) that in the “university discourse” defining knowledge is underpinned by a “master discourse” asserting a particular version of events. The medic made sense of an individual person according to a very specific discursive register As another medical example, a Sudanese doctor newly working in an emergency department in an Irish city was concerned that patients presenting with headaches may or may not have something seriously wrong with them. The trainees understood themselves in relation to the metric particular to the discourse that is productive of a specific field of meaning as regards how subject knowledge is understood. It’s very relationship with Truth is brought into question, or renewed (Lacan, 2008)

The overly social sciences
Diminishing artistic license
The out-sourcing of pedagogical subject knowledge
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call