Abstract

Abstract Hippopotamidae family is nowadays represented by two species within two different genera: pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) and common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). The common hippopotamus has a very unique anatomy, and the shape of the body, especially the head is adapted for a semi-aquatic life style. The morphological examination and description of the gross anatomical features of the hippopotamus skull is described in this paper. The shape of the skull is adapted for the amphibian way of life. Their eyes, ears and nostrils are placed high on the roof of the skull which allows these organs to remain above the surface of the water while the animal is being submerged underwater. The skull is massive, but the brain case (neurocranium) is extremely small compared with the splanchnocranium and complete head. The dental formula of the common hippopotamus is: incisors (I) 2/2, canines (C) 1/1, premolars (P) 3-4/3-4 and molars (M) 3/3. Incisors and canine teeth are formed in the shape of tusks and are used for threat or “demonstration of power” among animals when vigorously fi ghting. Incisor teeth grow continuously and are twice bigger in males than in females.

Highlights

  • Hippopotamidae family is nowadays represented by two species within two different genera: pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) and common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius)

  • The common hippopotamus has a very unique anatomy, and the shape of the body, especially the head is adapted for a semi-aquatic life style

  • The skull is massive, but the brain case is extremely small compared with the splanchnocranium and complete head

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Hippopotamidae family is nowadays represented by two species within two different genera: pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) and common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). From the frontal bone, paired temporal bones (os temporale) were situated and it formed the largest part of the lateral part of the roof of the skull This bone communicated caudally with occipital, cranially with the zygomatic, dorsally with the parietal and ventrally with the sphenoid bone. Palatinal process (processus palatinus) of incisive bone was like in other mammals in form of well developed thin, bony, dorso-ventrally flattened plate, which was forming rostral part of the osseous base of the hard palate Both palatinal process were communicating in the medial plane forming long narrow fissure (fissura interincisiva), while their lateral ridge was separated from the maxilla and nasal part of incisive bone by wide oval – shaped opening (fissura palatina) [2,3,5,11].

Leidy J
O’Leary MA
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call